Where are the Pentagon's 9/11 photos?


Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Where are Pentagon's 9/11 photos?

Are you a journalist puzzled about 9/11 conspiracy claims?

Much of the argument seems too technical to come to grips with. But I invite you to look at a few photos of the Pentagon 9/11 damage and read my short commentary at
http://krypto-graff.blogspot.com/2010/07/remarks-on-pentagon-911-claims.html

You don't need to be an expert to see that available photos tend to undermine the government story. But, if you would like to see photos that show certain debris patterns, you will probably find that they aren't available.

Most Pentagon 9/11 photos have not been released. Perhaps one of you will try to get a look via the Freedom of Information Act. Try to get the FBI to release its forensic 9/11 photos also. I would expect that, after many months of wrangling, a few worthless tokens would be released.

(I haven't recently filed such requests, but perhaps in future I will be in a position to do so.)
Posted by at   

No comments:

Post a Comment



Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog



'Activist scientist backs 9/11 line' and other old blog posts

Image
The Znewz1 blog Paul Conant, aka Roger Conant, has reported for the New York Times. Conant is "that guy" who exists in a legal and media limbo that we're not supposed to talk about explicitly. Shhh... [Email: Znewz1@yahoo.com] Fight net censorship: LINK THIS BLOG TO YOUR SITE. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.This blog's ever-morphing bugs are intractable. I will try using another account. Please see http://znewz1alternate.blogspot.com SUNDAY, DECEMBER 24, 2006
Activist scientist backs official 9/11 line Manuel Garcia, a government weapons scientist, has gone to bat for the official narrative of the collapses of the World Trade Center towers as part of an assault by a group of leftists on those skeptical of government findings and the implication of a conspiracy within federal agencies.

Three analyses by Garcia were published by the noted leftist Alexander Cockburn in Cockburn's magazine Counterpunch. Cockburn, an Irishman living in the United S…
READ MORE

Even more old posts in need of sorting

Kryptograff Kryptograff is where Paul Conant posts some of his musings on mathematics and science. Conant, a former newspaperman, holds no degrees in these areas. Write him at Conant78@gmail.com or phone ab8ab6ab5ab ba2ba3ba5ba ab2ab9ab4ab7ab (ignore non-numerals). Googling "Kryptograff" may direct you to other posts at different URLs. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2010Drunk and disorderly: the rise of entropy

Some musings about entropy posted Nov. 20, 2010 One might describe the increase of the entropy0 of a gas to mean that the net vector -- sum of vectors of all particles -- at between time t0 and tntends toward 0 and that once this equilibrium is reached at tn, the net vector stays near 0 at any subsequent time.

One would expect a nearly 0 net vector if the individual particle vectors are random. This randomness is exactly what one would find in an asymmetrical n-body scenario, where the bodies are close together and about the same size. The difference is that gravity isn't …
READ MORE

9/11 probers skipped key forensic tests

This article appeared in PrisonPlanet December 6, 2008
Paul Conant
Znewz1
Saturday, Dec 06, 2008
Federal scientists ruled out controlled demolitions of three World Trade Center towers but declined to perform routine tests on soil and debris for traces of explosives or incendiaries, a review of National Institute of Standards and Technology publications shows.

The agency, which spent $16 million on its inquiry into the Sept. 11, 2001, collapses, said such tests weren’t needed because computer simulations and other considerations had shown that controlled demolitions were improbable. In an August 2006 fact sheet, the agency frankly admits that it did not test trade center steel for the residue of explosives or the incendiaries thermite and thermate. The agency’s decision to omit routine tests contrasts with its assertion that “some 200 technical experts — including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia — reviewed tens of thousands of d…
READ MORE